| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to thetwilightteens
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
|
Moderators: infamous, Madame Meg, essa01, Twilight_Addiction, PhieLine, michelealicecullen13, Twilight Group, Administration

imprint122 wrote:
Personally, I think some of you are ripping Breaking Dawn apart piece by piece, searching for its flaws. For example: Twilight7322, you say that the pregnancy was way too long because both Bella and Edward were in pain, and you do not like their pain. Yet you also say that New Moon is your favourite book. Come on -- what is pain if it is not the separation of Edward and Bella? You did not like Renesmee's birth. But here's a review on a life lesson we all know. Sex + no protection = pregnancy. Bella and Edward had no idea that they could even concieve, so they went ahead -- woohoo, we have a baby. Bella felt connected to 'her little nudger' (must you be reminded?) and SM led up to that gradually. Of course she was going to love her baby -- if she hadn't, then BD would not have been the happy ending book it now rests as, and I'm positive that there would be even more claims that Breaking Dawn was not exemplary.
Also: you say that SM 'got her money.' Was that meant to be offensive? I'm pretty sure Stephenie is not writing this for the money -- maybe for the enjoyment of her fans. "personally, i wish she wouldve taken more time on this she might of come to her sences and re-wrote something better" ??? That's not fair. That's trashing SM, and if you find that Breaking Dawn was so incompetent, so mediocre, why do you spend your time creating havoc? Just leave it alone.
NedraLynnCullen, IronGiant Mobile, Cullenist among others, I give you a standing ovation. =)

KATI not KATIE wrote: Lord knows I want men.



Kati, you said that the characters aren't being themselves. I agree with you -- up to a point. After the second book within BD, after Bella gets changed, i hardly recognized her anymore. She was... different? Older.
KATI not KATIE wrote:waitforthebite, I don't know about the whole "don't burn return" idea. I kind of like it. I don't exactly like the whole "LET'S HURT HER FEELINGS" thing, I don't agree with that. But there really aren't many ways to show her just how upset some people are. In a way, I applaud the people who actually went through with Don't Burn Return, because it's telling Stephenie that she disappointed people. I think she needs to know that after what she published... I don't know. I'm not returning my copy, though. I may hate it, but I'm keeping it just for the set.



imprint122 wrote:Do you know what I just realized?
I realized that we are all partially crazy (no offense to anyone, of course). Twilight really does have us hooked. I mean, instead of going and doing something productive (like maybe helping my Mom start dinner) I'm over here... and somehow, that's okay, I LOVE this! =)
emmetthebrute (Nick?), you make an excellent point; I've never thought of it that way before, and it really eases things up on the book, even though I'm pro-BD through and through. Thanks, anyway. As a saga (all FOUR books), it still remains at the top of my list, there's almost no comparison. Again, thanks for intervening.
NedraLynnCullen, you're welcome =) I just wish that I'd made my opinion clear in another way than I had in my first comment, that was unnecessarily critical. I just wrote it out without pausing to try and empathize with other people's opinions, and that was pretty uncalled for. Twilight will be the death of me =|
waitforthebite, THANK YOU! That's a really nice thing for you to say, I just hope I redeemed myself. Lasting first impressions, and all =D And I really did get where you were coming from -- BD was written differently than the first 3, and that, I think, took a little while to get used to (I read the book twice, within one week of each other)
Kati -- your psychic thing, that's pretty cool. I hope you're right about it =) And I do understand your point, about the whenever-you're-ready matter -- but I don't think that Edward wasn't ready to have a kid, per se. I think he freaked out because it was hurting Bella. From the beginning, it was very unnatural. But one thing that I am truly disappointed in -- I wanted Edward and Nessie to have more father-daughter time. It was hard to truly think of Edward as a dad... I mean... it's Edward. But otherwise, his actions were pretty explained to me. I dunno... =S Personally, I thought that sex-crazed Bella was hilarious! It's like, 'do me NOW, Edward! No negotiations!" But, I cannot identify with how Bella reacted when she found out that she was pregnant with Renesmee -- until I have a kid myself, I'll never be able to defend or offend her.
I think the main issue here is that Bella became a vampire. Before BD, I wanted her to become one sooo bad. Then, Edward wouldn't hold back, and she'd stop underestimating herself. But when she did change, it was like... whatever happened to the Bella we all know and love? The physical parts, I did not mind. But her thoughts changed BIG TIME. I learned to accept that though, because she's practically invincible. That's got to have some impact on her thoughts. I think that I'm gonna go and open Eclipse for some Edward/Bella love...
My stance is still unchanged, however. I LOVE BD... and now I'll look forward to Midnight Sun. =) Btw... I read somewhere that SM is going to write an Alice/Jasper story... true or false??
NedraLynnCullen wrote:Just because Edward is a vampire doesn't mean he can't produce sperm. That was never stated in the books. But still, I understand how it can be confusing. My mom went on a rant about how vampires can't get anyone pregnant. Long story on that ranting. But anywho. Like I said to my mom, the female vampires can't get pregnant due to the never aging thing. And in order to give birth it involves aging 9 months for the baby to grow and develop. But male vampires apparently, as shown with Edward, can cause human females to be pregnant. Apparently the male vampires are still giving off sperm but because it's almost always with a female vampire the sperm is never obvious because it's a female vampire, and they can't age so pregnancy isn't an option.
Long rambling, but there's your answer lol.
marisal wrote:NedraLynnCullen wrote:Just because Edward is a vampire doesn't mean he can't produce sperm. That was never stated in the books. But still, I understand how it can be confusing. My mom went on a rant about how vampires can't get anyone pregnant. Long story on that ranting. But anywho. Like I said to my mom, the female vampires can't get pregnant due to the never aging thing. And in order to give birth it involves aging 9 months for the baby to grow and develop. But male vampires apparently, as shown with Edward, can cause human females to be pregnant. Apparently the male vampires are still giving off sperm but because it's almost always with a female vampire the sperm is never obvious because it's a female vampire, and they can't age so pregnancy isn't an option.
Long rambling, but there's your answer lol.
well thanks, but it is really confusing... i just figured that since they don't age either, don't males also need to change in order to be able to reproduce? but i guess i'll be able to wrap my head around it, but thanks alot, it helps clarify.....
Return to Breaking Dawn - Book 4 in the Twilight Series
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests